Banning appeal - dv[8]

Want to report problems or bugs concerning the CTF Minsta+Hook Server? Here's the place.
User avatar
Akari
Posts: 62
Joined: 22 May 2010, 18:22
Location: Donetsk, Ukraine

Re: Banning appeal - dv[8]

Post by Akari » 27 Apr 2011, 18:41

The UFB ban should be fixed now, we're going to stop syncing bans from DTG. As for the "trigger bot", maybe I should start using a real one that I wrote a long time ago, just so you can compare?
Image
ArchLinux - A simple, lightweight Linux distribution.

User avatar
Pir*
Posts: 23
Joined: 21 Mar 2010, 18:32

Re: Banning appeal - dv[8]

Post by Pir* » 28 Apr 2011, 08:48

As far as I know, the trigger aimbot can be recognized by swaying moves of the pointer over the target - this way the aimbot locks it. I watched Kaec many times and noticed nothing of that kind in his aiming.

User avatar
jngm
Posts: 8
Joined: 15 Sep 2010, 13:03
Location: Spain

Re: Banning appeal - dv[8]

Post by jngm » 28 Apr 2011, 10:54

The ban is not questionable, since is your server and your rules, and the admins manage it according to their own views. But from my point of view, putting him on the global banlist is not a good idea if you're not sure yet that he is cheating.

I've seen players with almost the same aim skill and I doubt that Kaec is using a triggerbot, anyway, there should be a way to find out if he is using one or not definitely.
[DodgingBullets] jngm

User avatar
AsgaR
Posts: 68
Joined: 22 Mar 2010, 17:08
Location: In the World of Doom and Darkness...

Re: Banning appeal - dv[8]

Post by AsgaR » 29 Apr 2011, 21:23

I agree with jngm at this.
I've seen playing him many times, and I didn't see any signs of an aimbot.
So I think this is NOT OK.

synap
Posts: 3
Joined: 29 Jul 2010, 13:46

Re: Banning appeal - dv[8]

Post by synap » 30 Apr 2011, 13:39

This ban is a sickening example of bad judgement, tunnel-vision and group induced self assuring bias.


Also adding to this, Kaec, Kitho. We love seeing you guys at The Choobs server.

Post Reply